Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT ONE GAMING PC High End Ultra (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190321
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 261 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 859 82% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,490 92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 139 Parallax 134 120% 140 fps	MRender 158 Gravity 131 Splatting 101 103% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7B98) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 7.28 5% 7.84 fps	MRender 9.76 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 14.9 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 416 Write 406 Mixed 327 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 19.5 97% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 32.3 56% 111 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 217GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 152 153 154 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 158 Write 147 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 152 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 109%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB 1,811 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.9 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Read 15 Write 8 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.8 10% 8.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 2x8GB 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 16.2 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 196%

UFO

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	12x
SX8200PNP 2TBAdataBench 287%, 22,361 samples	4x
MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TBSamsungBench 391%, 3,483 samples	3x

RAM
CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 88%, 11,125 samples	7x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 425 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 91%, 4,119 samples	3x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $1,139

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16