Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 09:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 96.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 180
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 358
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.4
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.6
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 27 2.5 82 26 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 239
Write 189
Mixed 192
SusWrite 54.8
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 15.6
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 58.7
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 42.5
34% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 79.5
Write 122
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 141
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 177 182 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 135
Mixed 39
SusWrite 177
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback