Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '19 at 22:07
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 97.8 49% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 169 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 3232) 1GB CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1245 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.9 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 22.9 14% 19.4 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 20.7 15% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: GF10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 61.8 Write 61.5 Mixed 40.8 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 14GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 47 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 47.3 Mixed 31 SusWrite 46.8 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 42%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 11GB free Firmware: 1AC0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 66 78 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 46.5 Write 59.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 68.6 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 8.4 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	17x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16