Average Bench: 4.71% (369th of 661)

Based on 125,970 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1287, 10DE 0F02 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 730 averaged 95.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 5.67fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 6.05fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 is just 3.58%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 6.29fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 5.37fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 125,970 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.5 Lighting 5.67 8.5
4.16 Reflection 6.29 9.5
1.2 Parallax 5.37 9.5
4.6% 5.78 fps
Min Avg Max
3.7 MRender 5.98 10.6
4.1 Gravity 6.05 8.04
3.1 Splatting 5.3 7.2
4.87% 5.77 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 82E9) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9.4
7% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
6% 8.27 fps
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.2
7% 8.6 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
6% 8.1 fps
MSI(1462 292A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 8.3
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.3 fps
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 1.3
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.2
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.5
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.23 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 1.4
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.5 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
125,970 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 41,794,538 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 125,970 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 8A9F) 20% 4% ± 1%
Device(0000 0000) 9% 4% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 730B) 9% 5% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 6% 6% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 6% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 4% 4% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 3% 6% ± 1%
Dell(1028 1083) 2% 6% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 850C) 2% 6% ± 1%
Device(1642 3E56) 2% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84F6) 2% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1119) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84F5) 2% 5% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90F5) 2% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3733) 1% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858E) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84DC) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84D6) 1% 5% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 2732) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8589) 1% 5% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F86) 1% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 8199) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1733) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B4E) 1% 6% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5327) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3666) 1% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8614) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8525) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84D9) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 292A) 1% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 3382) 1% 7% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 326C) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1287) 1% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0862) 0% 5% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 0% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858B) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8501) 0% 5% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5324) 0% 7% ± 0%
HP(103C 82E9) 0% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 0% 4% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 2739) 0% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1117) 0% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 292B) 0% 6% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0F02) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 730 Builds (Compare 33,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $329

Popular GeForce GT 730 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

5 days ago.

for people who like input lag and 2fps gaming!


Good

4 months ago.

Not bad for work on 2 monitors


Poor

8 days ago.

Only problem I can't install Battlefield V,Just Cause 4,because graphics is absolute but,


Terrible

14 days ago.

Is very old and my computer ahs one and it never went to standards ever when it was realeased.


Good

10 months ago.

Yo la tengo y me va bastante bien por el precio y todo


Poor

5 months ago.

I have this graphic card for 5 years now. Old games run well, but forget playing new games on this. Even Indie or games or smaller games will go just on the lowest resolution on 30fps maximum.


Good

6 hrs ago.

because this is what im using right now


Good

1 month ago.

i love this grapich card because i have one and also it can run lots of amazing games.


Excellent

3 days ago.

i have it and im 600 fps at minecraft good gpu buy it!


Poor

3 months ago.

It is okay for low entry games but it can't run better games


Poor

4 months ago.

best card ever can run PUBG at ultra low graphics its amazing


Average

2 months ago.

I use it to work on 3 monitors, business use, not games. Quite satisfactory, inaudible and I have nothing bad to say.


Poor

7 months ago.

It's terrible, It can barely even run ROBLOX, A KIDS GAME!


Poor

5 months ago.

worst gpu for its price .54$ for wind


Good

11 months ago.

I have this GPU in my current pc and i can run literally every game its amazing (paired with 2 Core 2 Thread Celeron)


Average

18 months ago.

Holds OK for anyone with very low budget and supported DX11 but has little graphical horsepower for modern gaming which makes this GPU insufficient for moderate to heavy gaming.


Average

22 months ago.

I'm glad to have had this GPU. It is decent. I get good framerates in games such as Minecraft and War Thunder when using medium graphics settings (120 and 30 respectively). When using third party shaders in Minecraft I get around 10-30 FPS depending on the intensity of the shader. I also play a Unity game which has an outdated engine, and I get 7-30 FPS. I find that I need something better for the future if I want to get better performance.


Average

2 years ago.

It's good enough to get it done, but that's it.


Average

3 years ago.

Fine with Dota 2. The first thing to go if I got the budget to upgrade.


Average

17 months ago.

Not good for gaming, guys.


Average

21 months ago.

Not bad, still OK for old Wolfdale CPUs and underclocked FX. I'd buy GT 1030 or used 1050 rather than this old 730, it's expensive and its performance is often really poor in games. At least it's OK in CS:GO.


Your
opinion?
661 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback