TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GeForce GT 730

▲ 522,243 ▼

Release date ≤ Q3 2014.

Average Bench: 4.85% (357th of 652)

Based on 124,260 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1287, 10DE 0F02 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Poor: 3%Average: 4.85% Great: 7%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 730 averaged 95.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 5.87fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 6.22fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 is just 3.47%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 6.32fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 5.77fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 124,260 samples)
Rank 3574.85%
Min Avg Max
3.7 Lighting 5.87 8.5
4.4 Reflection 6.32 9.6
1.2 Parallax 5.77 9.4
4.73% 5.99 fps
Min Avg Max
3.7 MRender 5.9 10.6
4.2 Gravity 6.22 7.4
3.2 Splatting 5.57 7.2
5% 5.89 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.33 fps
Dell(1028 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7
6% 6.3 fps
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.23 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.07 fps
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 7.1
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6
5% 5.23 fps
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 1.4
4% 4.07 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.6
4% 4.83 fps
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.8
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.33 fps
Asus(1043 84D9) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 1.3
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
124,260 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,538,181 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 124,260 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
MSI(1462 8A9F) 16% 4% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 730B) 9% 5% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 7% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 6% 6% ± 1%
Device(0000 0000) 4% 4% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 3% 6% ± 1%
Device(1642 3E56) 3% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1083) 3% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 850C) 3% 6% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2% 4% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84F5) 2% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858E) 2% 3% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 326C) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8589) 2% 6% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F86) 2% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B4E) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84DC) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84F6) 1% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1119) 1% 5% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 1% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 292A) 1% 5% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3666) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 82E9) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1733) 1% 5% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 8199) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3733) 1% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 85BA) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84D9) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84D6) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2732) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0862) 1% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 859E) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2738) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 1% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8501) 1% 5% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 365C) 1% 7% ± 0%
Dell(1028 3382) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 861F) 1% 5% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1% 7% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90F5) 1% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 0% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 0% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2739) 0% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858B) 0% 5% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 355B) 0% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2730) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GeForce GT 730 Builds (Compare 27,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 74%, 222,536 samples1,814x
Core i7-2600Intel  $226Bench 71%, 149,549 samples1,566x
Core i5-2400Intel  $75Bench 69%, 129,560 samples1,053x
GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 124,260 samples1x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 67%, 246,101 samples903x
A400 120GBKingston  $20Bench 61%, 116,034 samples545x
Virtual NVMe Disk 275GBParallelsBench 199%, 669 samples481x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 371,426 samples1,091x
4x2GBUnknownBench 24%, 156,406 samples710x
1x4GBUnknownBench 24%, 128,880 samples437x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $325

Popular GeForce GT 730 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
7,358

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

5 days ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
4,632

Good

9 days ago.

for people who like input lag and 2fps gaming!

RUS-User
Avatar level
4,044

Good

2 months ago.

Not bad for work on 2 monitors

CAN-User
Avatar level
3,858

Poor

4 months ago.

Only problem I can't install Battlefield V,Just Cause 4,because graphics is absolute but,

ROU-User
Avatar level
3,511

Good

19 hrs ago.

I used to have it, it can run Crysis, but its very weak. A GTX 1050 ti is much better.

ESP-User
Avatar level
3,103

Good

8 months ago.

Yo la tengo y me va bastante bien por el precio y todo

CZE-User
Avatar level
2,622

Poor

2 months ago.

I have this graphic card for 5 years now. Old games run well, but forget playing new games on this. Even Indie or games or smaller games will go just on the lowest resolution on 30fps maximum.

PHL-User
Avatar level
2,472

Poor

5 days ago.

because this is what im using right now

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,304

Poor

1 month ago.

i love this grapich card because i have one and also it can run lots of amazing games.

SVN-User
Avatar level
1,724

Poor

28 days ago.

It is okay for low entry games but it can't run better games

NZL-User
Avatar level
1,624

Poor

1 month ago.

best card ever can run PUBG at ultra low graphics its amazing

BIH-User
Avatar level
1,302

Average

6 days ago.

I use it to work on 3 monitors, business use, not games. Quite satisfactory, inaudible and I have nothing bad to say.

MKD-User
Avatar level
1,016

Poor

4 months ago.

It's terrible, It can barely even run ROBLOX, A KIDS GAME!

UZB-User
Avatar level
792

Poor

2 months ago.

worst gpu for its price .54$ for wind

PRY-User
Avatar level
648

Good

8 months ago.

I have this GPU in my current pc and i can run literally every game its amazing (paired with 2 Core 2 Thread Celeron)

ColdSpy
Avatar level
332

Average

15 months ago.

Holds OK for anyone with very low budget and supported DX11 but has little graphical horsepower for modern gaming which makes this GPU insufficient for moderate to heavy gaming.

MrManiac3
Avatar level
18

Average

20 months ago.

I'm glad to have had this GPU. It is decent. I get good framerates in games such as Minecraft and War Thunder when using medium graphics settings (120 and 30 respectively). When using third party shaders in Minecraft I get around 10-30 FPS depending on the intensity of the shader. I also play a Unity game which has an outdated engine, and I get 7-30 FPS. I find that I need something better for the future if I want to get better performance.

Raceplays
Avatar level
10

Average

22 months ago.

It's good enough to get it done, but that's it.

tadaoandoy
Avatar level
8

Average

3 years ago.

Fine with Dota 2. The first thing to go if I got the budget to upgrade.

martui
Avatar level
8

Average

14 months ago.

Not good for gaming, guys.

VaporeonPL
Avatar level
2

Average

19 months ago.

Not bad, still OK for old Wolfdale CPUs and underclocked FX. I'd buy GT 1030 or used 1050 rather than this old 730, it's expensive and its performance is often really poor in games. At least it's OK in CS:GO.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3080
vs Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
vs Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2060
vs Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
vs AMD RX 5600-XT

652 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i3-10100F $120Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback