Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GeForce GT 730

▲ 544,345 ▼

Release date ≤ Q3 2014.

Average Bench: 4.87% (422nd of 713)

Based on 164,888 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1287, 10DE 0F02 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Poor: 3%Average: 4.87% Great: 7%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 730 averaged 95.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 5.94fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 5.77fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 is just 3.75%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 6.16fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 6.16fps

Average Bench

(Based on 164,888 samples)
Rank 4224.87%
Min Avg Max
3.5 Lighting 5.94 8.3
3.8 Reflection 6.16 9.1
1.2 Parallax 6.16 9.4
4.83% 6.08 fps
Min Avg Max
3.32 MRender 6.15 10.4
4.1 Gravity 6.33 7.4
3.2 Splatting 5.77 7.2
4.93% 6.08 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 3382) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 475.14
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 9.3
7% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.27 fps
Asus(1043 8614) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 475.14
6.64% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 9.5
7% 8.8 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.2 fps
Asus(1043 8589) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 8.2
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7
5% 6.2 fps
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 475.14
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 4
Parallax 7.3
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.8 fps
PNY(196E 1119) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.33 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.73 fps
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.5
4% 4.43 fps
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.27 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.4
3% 4.23 fps
164,888 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,769,868 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 164,888 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
MSI(1462 8A9F) 15% 4% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 730B) 8% 5% ± 1%
Device(0000 0000) 8% 4% ± 1%
Asus(1043 881A) 8% 6% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 6% 4% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 5% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 3% 6% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 3% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B4E) 2% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1083) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 884A) 2% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84F6) 2% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 379B) 2% 5% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1119) 2% 5% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90F5) 2% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84F5) 2% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84DC) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 850C) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85BA) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 1% 5% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 3737) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84D6) 1% 5% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 326C) 1% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3733) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858B) 1% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858E) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(1642 3E56) 1% 5% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 0% 6% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1127) 0% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 292A) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0862) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8589) 0% 6% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 365C) 0% 7% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F86) 0% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3666) 0% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 8E96) 0% 5% ± 0%
HP(103C 82E9) 0% 6% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8525) 0% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84DA) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 887F) 0% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2732) 0% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0988) 0% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2739) 0% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 0% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1733) 0% 5% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GeForce GT 730 Builds (Compare 10,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples2,094x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,085x
Core i5-2400Intel  $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples1,024x
GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples771x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples508x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples285x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples278x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples657x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples619x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples248x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94

Popular GeForce GT 730 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,044

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

2 days ago.

the best budget graphics card for school or work

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,867

Good

19 days ago.

it's perfect for occife work with two monitors

ROU-User
Avatar level
4,753

Average

4 months ago.

okay with games starting from 2013 or really optimized games, overclocking overheats it badly and may risk artifacting

AUS-User
Avatar level
4,042

Terrible

9 months ago.

cannot even run minecraft above 60fps with optimised settings

ESP-User
Avatar level
3,815

Good

2 months ago.

Yo la tengo y me va bastante bien por el precio y todo

CZE-User
Avatar level
3,416

Good

21 months ago.

I have this graphic card for 5 years now. Old games run well, but forget playing new games on this. Even Indie or games or smaller games will go just on the lowest resolution on 30fps maximum.

ISR-User
Avatar level
2,404

Good

22 months ago.

i have it and im 600 fps at minecraft good gpu buy it!

SVN-User
Avatar level
2,090

Poor

3 years ago.

It is okay for low entry games but it can't run better games

AZE-User
Avatar level
1,434

Good

11 months ago.

because this is just display adapter

MKD-User
Avatar level
1,344

Terrible

16 months ago.

It's terrible, It can barely even run ROBLOX, A KIDS GAME!

UZB-User
Avatar level
1,314

Good

3 months ago.

worst gpu for its price .54$ for wind

PRY-User
Avatar level
804

Good

3 years ago.

I have this GPU in my current pc and i can run literally every game its amazing (paired with 2 Core 2 Thread Celeron)

ColdSpy
Avatar level
330

Average

5 years ago.

Holds OK for anyone with very low budget and supported DX11 but has little graphical horsepower for modern gaming which makes this GPU insufficient for moderate to heavy gaming.

MrManiac3
Avatar level
40

Average

5 years ago.

I'm glad to have had this GPU. It is decent. I get good framerates in games such as Minecraft and War Thunder when using medium graphics settings (120 and 30 respectively). When using third party shaders in Minecraft I get around 10-30 FPS depending on the intensity of the shader. I also play a Unity game which has an outdated engine, and I get 7-30 FPS. I find that I need something better for the future if I want to get better performance.

mirr123
Avatar level
30

Poor

3 years ago.

can barely handle even simple games like gungeon without massively dropping fps let alone something like rocket league or red dead redmption II . Unless you only plan on playing strategy based games or are using this for an office pc , do not buy

Raceplays
Avatar level
10

Average

5 years ago.

It's good enough to get it done, but that's it.

martui
Avatar level
8

Average

5 years ago.

Not good for gaming, guys.

Jinutechlife
Avatar level
4

Average

3 years ago.

Not bad but not the best sure you can find GDDR5 or GDDR3 models with 2 or 4GB of video ram and to be fair it ain't good for gaming but its probably better than some 30 dollar Quadro you find on eBay so yeah gaming is still technically possible for example as long you have a 2 core and 4 threads processer though I suggest a minimum of 4 cores and 8 threads or even 6 cores it ain't bad in games like Minecraft, Roblox, csgo, and some other CPU dependent games. I understand the GPU storage is terrible but trust me I seen GTX 1650 super in under 300 dollars so save up a bit more and get some pretty decent performance from the graphics card. In conclusion, it's not good nor bad but decent enough to do workstations and low-end gaming. So can you still buy this GPU for fun technically yes but I'd rather buy it after 2021 since most GPU storages are stated to go on until Amazon, eBay, Newegg, Nvidia, AMD, and other companies publish the anti scalper law or design an anti-bot and multi-buy bot?

75hZ
Avatar level
4

Excellent

2 years ago.

I think low price and average performance in my opinion

VaporeonPL
Avatar level
2

Average

5 years ago.

Not bad, still OK for old Wolfdale CPUs and underclocked FX. I'd buy GT 1030 or used 1050 rather than this old 730, it's expensive and its performance is often really poor in games. At least it's OK in CS:GO.

804k
Avatar level
2

Terrible

21 months ago.

A very bad GPU, can barely run anything at a reasonable FPS

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 10 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback