Average Bench: 4.83% (333rd of 639)

Based on 92,883 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1287, 10DE 0F02 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 730 averaged 95.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 17.2fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 17.6fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 is just 3.21%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 16fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 18.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 92,883 samples)
Min Avg Max
11.5 Lighting 17.2 26.9
11.6 Reflection 16 20.6
8.66 Parallax 18.7 29.9
4.5% 17.3 fps
Min Avg Max
8.4 MRender 13.2 23.5
12.2 Gravity 17.6 23
6.9 Splatting 11.9 17.2
4.87% 14.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 29.4
7% 25.6 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.5
7% 20.6 fps
Device(1B0A 90F5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.23
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 29.3
7% 25 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.4
6% 20.4 fps
Device(1642 3F86) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.50
Lighting 26
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 28.3
7% 24.9 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.5
6% 20.2 fps
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 28.7
5% 21.8 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.7
6% 16.1 fps
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 24.2
5% 20.1 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.4
6% 15.7 fps
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 24.7
5% 20.5 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.4
6% 15.6 fps
Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 24.4
5% 20.8 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 16.4
6% 15.7 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 10.9
3% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 7.2
4% 10.6 fps
92,883 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,505,283 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 92,883 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 8A9F) 19% 4% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 9% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 730B) 8% 5% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 7% 4% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 4% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84DC) 3% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84F5) 3% 6% ± 0%
Device(1642 3E56) 3% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3% 5% ± 2%
Asus(1043 84F6) 2% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1083) 2% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3733) 2% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 858E) 2% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1733) 2% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 850C) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2732) 1% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 8199) 1% 4% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84D9) 1% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 292A) 1% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8589) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8525) 1% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 1% 4% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85BA) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0862) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B4E) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3666) 1% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 0% 5% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1127) 0% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2739) 0% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 858B) 0% 5% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 8327) 0% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 365C) 0% 7% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F86) 0% 6% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0F02) 0% 4% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 326C) 0% 5% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 0% 6% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90F5) 0% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84D6) 0% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 859E) 0% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2738) 0% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0988) 0% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 0% 4% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0F02) 0% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1731) 0% 6% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 730 Builds (Compare 60,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $259

Popular GeForce GT 730 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

1 day ago.

No driver support, and doesn't perform any better on Skyrim or EQ2 or WoW than the intel HD 4000 graphics.


Poor

20 days ago.

It has served me well for 720p gaming on games like GTA V


Excellent

27 days ago.

ааааааааааааааа


Excellent

24 days ago.

Only problem I can't install Battlefield V,Just Cause 4,because graphics is absolute but,


Good

5 days ago.

Yo la tengo y me va bastante bien por el precio y todo


Good

3 days ago.

This is one of the best graphics card for low budget gamers!


Excellent

16 days ago.

I have this graphic card for 5 years now. Old games run well, but forget playing new games on this. Even Indie or games or smaller games will go just on the lowest resolution on 30fps maximum.


Good

2 months ago.

i'm using gt 730 zotac and 3 gb ram. and while your playing in csgo actually it will crash i think i need to upgrade 6 gb ram?


Excellent

3 months ago.

i love this grapich card because i have one and also it can run lots of amazing games.


Excellent

4 months ago.

i am using this gpu. but i realy love it


Excellent

2 years ago.

best card ever can run PUBG at ultra low graphics its amazing


Terrible

7 days ago.

It's terrible, It can barely even run ROBLOX, A KIDS GAME!


Excellent

9 days ago.

worst gpu for its price .54$ for wind


Good

30 days ago.

I have this GPU in my current pc and i can run literally every game its amazing (paired with 2 Core 2 Thread Celeron)


Average

7 months ago.

Holds OK for anyone with very low budget and supported DX11 but has little graphical horsepower for modern gaming which makes this GPU insufficient for moderate to heavy gaming.


Average

12 months ago.

I'm glad to have had this GPU. It is decent. I get good framerates in games such as Minecraft and War Thunder when using medium graphics settings (120 and 30 respectively). When using third party shaders in Minecraft I get around 10-30 FPS depending on the intensity of the shader. I also play a Unity game which has an outdated engine, and I get 7-30 FPS. I find that I need something better for the future if I want to get better performance.


Average

14 months ago.

It's good enough to get it done, but that's it.


Average

2 years ago.

Fine with Dota 2. The first thing to go if I got the budget to upgrade.


Average

6 months ago.

Not good for gaming, guys.


Average

11 months ago.

Not bad, still OK for old Wolfdale CPUs and underclocked FX. I'd buy GT 1030 or used 1050 rather than this old 730, it's expensive and its performance is often really poor in games. At least it's OK in CS:GO.


Your
opinion?
639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback