Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '16 at 03:51
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 456
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 51.1
34% 47.2 fps
MRender 47.6
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 36.9
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
627GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 285
Write 231
Mixed 190
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 13.8
84% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 41.9
66% 129 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 107%
Crucial BX100 1TB-$500
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67% Good
Read 371
Write 351
Mixed 359
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 19.5
76% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 72.1
81% 137 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67%
Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
119GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 22.3
28% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.24
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.78
60% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Vulcan 1600 04EF Vulcan 1600 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAO 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAO 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback