HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory8.5 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 168
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 496
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 309.8
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 13.5
11% 13 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 221 201 186 210 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 239
Write 223
Mixed 203
SusWrite 203
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 39.8
130% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 50.5
42% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
128GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 92.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 100
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback