| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5QC (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090427 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 22 '20 at 18:08 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52%
Above average
|
45% 70.1 Pts
|
24% 182 Pts
|
11% 184 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
21.1%
Poor
|
20% 26.2 fps
|
23% 28.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume0 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 232 241 256 250 MB/s
|
124%
Outstanding
|
126% 174 MB/s
|
265% 2.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 98 104 99 98 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
72% 97.9 MB/s
|
174% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Volume1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 189 187 182 189 194 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
132% 181 MB/s
|
269% 2.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
23.6%
Poor
|
22% 7.53 GB/s
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
42% 94.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QC Builds (Compare 126 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 37x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |