| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 0.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M730 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A2 |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131014 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 24 '20 at 14:09 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
60% 100 Pts
|
36% 267 Pts
|
15% 244 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 361.91
|
3.06%
Terrible
|
4% 4.22 fps
|
2% 3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.5%
Average
|
40% 14.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
50% 79.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 40x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 9x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 13x |
| NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $440 |