Average Bench: 3.4% (478th of 715)

Based on 8,087 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0FFA Model: NVIDIA Quadro K600

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K600 averaged 96.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 3.87fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 4.58fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K600 is just 0.32%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K600 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 5.26fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.49fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 8,087 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.6 Lighting 3.87 4
2.94 Reflection 5.26 5.8
3.92 Parallax 4.49 4.7
3.17% 4.54 fps
Min Avg Max
4.8 MRender 4.98 5.1
3.9 Gravity 4.67 5.1
4.5 Splatting 4.58 4.7
3.87% 4.75 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.87 fps
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.04
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.87 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.13
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.5 fps
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.43 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.8 fps
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.6
3% 4 fps
8,087 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,818,297 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 8,087 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 54% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 094B) 46% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E5) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K600 Builds (Compare 2,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $160

Popular Quadro K600 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Average

19 months ago.

just a place holder. pretty decent


Excellent

4 years ago.

Works great for what i paid for it, used it in a dell optiplex 790 as a graphics card to a budget gaming computer. Overclocks a decent amount and I got 60 fps on various games in Dolphin emulator including Mario kart while at 720p with 8x SSAA and 16x anisotropic filtering (doesn't seem to work well with 1080p). On 1080p with Minecraft I am able to get 106fps(avg) with the standard render distance and fancy graphics, and get 70fps(avg) with maximum render distance and fancy graphics. Overall its surprised me with how well it works and is a couple steps up from the integrated intel graphics that i was using before. When overclocked i was able to achieve 7.5% on the benchmark (can view in my saved benchmarks) which is higher than your average GT 730, GT 710, and GT 720, which are all more expensive. So if you are on a budget for a low profile graphics card perhaps consider this one.


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback