PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7817 |
Motherboard | MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150421 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 20 '17 at 11:38 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.4%
Average
|
||||
WD Elements 1TB
289GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown U3A4G83-16GBHN2B00 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 403x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 301x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 177x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 343x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 235x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $335 |