| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock G31M-GS. (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120516 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '20 at 23:09 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.4%
Average
|
40% 58.8 Pts
|
10% 74.2 Pts
|
5% 80.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
|
4.9%
Terrible
|
5% 6.86 fps
|
5% 5.81 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 196 183 215 218 215 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
49% 217 MB/s
|
116% 38.8 MB/s
|
44% 61.2 MB/s
|
|
ST2000LX001-1RG1 2TB
103GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 40 43 42 37 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
56% 40.8 MB/s
|
122% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
14% 5 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G31M-GS. Builds (Compare 76 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock G31M-GS.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples | 5x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $138 |