PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110826 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 23 '20 at 11:07 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | BLR-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 975
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
55.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 245 300 296 297 292 MB/s
|
93.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
2TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 119 122 122 123 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX16LC9/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 8x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 5x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples | 6x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 5x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $448 |