Pcware IPMH61G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardPcware IPMH61G1  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '17 at 21:49
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 90.5
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 107
Mixed 31.3
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.32
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20.7
Write 3.11
Mixed 5.54
9% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RM25664BA1339.8FR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH61G1 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Pcware IPMH61G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback