Toshiba SATELLITE S50-B

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE S50-B (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141008
Uptime	16.5 Days
Run Date	May 03 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 154 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 209 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F920) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 4.97 3% 4.51 fps	MRender 6.67 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 6 4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 256GB 1,754 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUT10101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 74 68 74 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 319 Write 96 Mixed 215 SusWrite 72.4 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 35.8 107% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 202 155% 219 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 97%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 8GB free, PID 043b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 20 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 16.3 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 20.5 27% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 20.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE S50-B Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE S50-B

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	53x
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	47x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	29x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	100x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	74x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	15x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	10x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	59x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	18x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16