Average Bench: 2.36% (503rd of 698)

Based on 275,372 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0A16 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics Family

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) averaged 97.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 2.75fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 3.52fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) is just 1.19%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 3.72fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.52fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 275,372 samples)
Min Avg Max
1.9 Lighting 2.75 3.36
1.3 Reflection 3.72 9.9
3.1 Parallax 4.52 5.8
2.23% 3.66 fps
Min Avg Max
2.6 MRender 4.15 5.7
1.5 Gravity 1.85 2.2
2.6 Splatting 3.52 4.5
2.6% 3.17 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 06AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 3.9
3% 2.67 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.33 fps
Acer(1025 0987) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.2
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4
3% 3.77 fps
Device(1071 A065) 1GB
Driver: dlumd9.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.3
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.43 fps
Device(1071 A065) 1GB
Driver: dlumd9.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 4.7
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.63 fps
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.97 fps
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1
2% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.9
1% 1.27 fps
HP(103C 2166) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 5
0% 3.57 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 4.13 fps
Dell(1028 05EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.2
0% 2.67 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.9 fps
275,372 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 60,050,841 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards (based on 275,372 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 220C) 6% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3978) 5% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CB) 5% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380D) 4% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05DE) 4% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380C) 3% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0866) 3% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0651) 2% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F920) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CA) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E0) 2% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2214) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EA) 2% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0775) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 16CD) 2% 2% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0005) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 131D) 2% 2% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2218) 2% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2212) 2% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E9) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 390B) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2281) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 130D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EB) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 228A) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 15AD) 1% 3% ± 1%
Dell(1028 061F) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 10D0) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2211) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0005) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2166) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 063E) 1% 2% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0A16) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0640) 1% 2% ± 1%
Acer(1025 079B) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2217) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 22D6) 1% 2% ± 0%
Device(10F7 8338) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 12DD) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0004) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2163) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0652) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 21B8) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0918) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EC) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0882) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 220D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 165D) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 227E) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0608) 1% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3542

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $17

Popular HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.

My SP3 crushs any games from 2004 or before, GTAIII,VA,SA,Bully all smooth as butter great for emulation too


Good

22 months ago.

Not so good. It can only run games like Roblox, Minecraft, Counter Strike 1.6, GTA San Andreas and VALORANT but games like CSGO or GTA won't work with this PC (Laptop)


Terrible

2 years ago.

Open every game but bad performance...


Terrible

17 months ago.

Horrible gpu, can barley brake 40 fps in Minecraft, can only run ultra low settings in most games, this doesn't even meet system requirements for most modern games.


Good

2 years ago.

Cheap unuseable... 3% out of all, in 2019?!


Excellent

14 months ago.

Sufficient for non graphics intensive software


Excellent

2 years ago.

wait too weak for basically any game


Average

6 months ago.

Not a good gpu, can do simple 3d tasks and barely supports directx 12. doesnt even have vulkan. can game in some older games and some "recent" with low settings, performs like an xbox 360. similar to a gt 710 (2gb ddr3). performs slightly better than a 710 but its integrated so no big deal, ok if its a secondary gpu, get a dedicated one, this one is bad.


Good

2 years ago.

It is important to keep ram in dual channel mode if using this GPU. It increase its performance about 25 % (tested in Userbenchmark aplication). This GPU is obviously not for modern gaming, but accompanied with i7 - 4600u and 2 x 4GB ram, it handles surprisingly well the Star Wars Battlefront (2015 version). It was nice surprise for me, as I have considered this GPU to be good just for web browsing or for old games. Compared to its ancestor HD 3000, HD 4400 card is almost twice as strong, thus do not consider this chip to be just useless trash. In 2020 it is still perfectly sufficient for any kind of the non-heavy-graphic office work.


Good

2 years ago.

Definetly not good for gaming in 2019. For average or office use its fine. Exept if you are fine with cs go running in 800x600 with an avg of 50-60fps.


Good

2 years ago.

Kinda slow but works well for 720p laptops


Good

3 years ago.

Decent enough for a laptop for school. Also gets good frame rates on older titles and less graphic-intensive games, such as Minecraft or Terraria. Although, for really good frame rates on Minecraft, you need to use Optifine. I was able to get about 70 FPS on average with default settings while paired with an i5-4300u processor, 12 gigs of ddr3l-1600mhz ram, and a Kingston A400 120 GB SSD. Definitely overpowers the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) by a substantial margin, in my opinion.


Average

23 months ago.

it's a okay GPU


Good

3 years ago.

goodc


Terrible

2 years ago.

IT HAS THE GREAT SUCK


Your
opinion?
698 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $360Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback