Average Bench: 2.1% (454th of 643)

Based on 253,195 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0A16 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics Family

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) averaged 97.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 8.92fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 5.99fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) is just 0.93%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 14.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 16.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 253,195 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.1 Lighting 8.92 12.1
8.8 Reflection 14.4 25.1
11.1 Parallax 16.8 20.6
2.33% 13.4 fps
Min Avg Max
7.2 MRender 10.9 15.2
4.6 Gravity 5.99 6.7
9.4 Splatting 14 17.3
2.1% 10.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 228A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 19.1
3% 15.3 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 18.6
2% 13 fps
Asus(1043 13AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 18.7
3% 14.2 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 15.9
2% 12.2 fps
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 18.5
3% 14.6 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 15.9
2% 12 fps
HP(103C 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 17
0% 11.3 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 14.8
2% 11.5 fps
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 16.9
2% 13.6 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 5.9 fps
Legend(17AA 380C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3379
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 18.2
3% 14.2 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 15.4
2% 10.1 fps
Legend(17AA 3978) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3993
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 15.7
3% 12.5 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 12.9
2% 9.23 fps
HP(103C 2281) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 16.6
2% 17 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 13.9
2% 9.5 fps
253,195 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,342,207 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 253,195 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 198F) 4% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3978) 4% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380C) 4% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 220C) 4% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CB) 3% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CA) 3% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0866) 3% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380D) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05DE) 2% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0775) 2% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2212) 2% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2214) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 16CD) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 130D) 2% 2% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0005) 2% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2211) 2% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2281) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0651) 2% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 079B) 2% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0987) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E9) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 131D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 063E) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2248) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2166) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 1991) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0652) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EA) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0005) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2164) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2163) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 228A) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 167D) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2246) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E0) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 061F) 1% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2218) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 227E) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 213E) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 1946) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0918) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 228E) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0004) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8534) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2249) 0% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2247) 0% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 22DA) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 139D) 0% 2% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) Builds (Compare 4,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $309

Popular HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

4 days ago.

Very sad, maybe if it had more cores and vram


Terrible

1 day ago.

Open every game but bad performance...


Average

12 months ago.

I have been using this GPU to run games for 6 years now begin from 2013, and I know that it is not powerful however I managed to play the games I wanted to play at a reasonable performance, such as at a stable 60fps in League of legends on low settings 720p, and usually at 10-100fps in CSGO at low setting 800 x 600.


Excellent

5 months ago.

wait too weak for basically any game


Terrible

15 months ago.

Cheap unuseable... 3% out of all, in 2019?!


Good

5 months ago.

Trash out of date piece of garbage that can only run ROBLOX


Good

5 months ago.

It is important to keep ram in dual channel mode if using this GPU. It increase its performance about 25 % (tested in Userbenchmark aplication). This GPU is obviously not for modern gaming, but accompanied with i7 - 4600u and 2 x 4GB ram, it handles surprisingly well the Star Wars Battlefront (2015 version). It was nice surprise for me, as I have considered this GPU to be good just for web browsing or for old games. Compared to its ancestor HD 3000, HD 4400 card is almost twice as strong, thus do not consider this chip to be just useless trash. In 2020 it is still perfectly sufficient for any kind of the non-heavy-graphic office work.


Average

10 months ago.

Definetly not good for gaming in 2019. For average or office use its fine. Exept if you are fine with cs go running in 800x600 with an avg of 50-60fps.


Good

7 months ago.

Decent enough for a laptop for school. Also gets good frame rates on older titles and less graphic-intensive games, such as Minecraft or Terraria. Although, for really good frame rates on Minecraft, you need to use Optifine. I was able to get about 70 FPS on average with default settings while paired with an i5-4300u processor, 12 gigs of ddr3l-1600mhz ram, and a Kingston A400 120 GB SSD. Definitely overpowers the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) by a substantial margin, in my opinion.


Good

14 months ago.

goodc


Terrible

3 months ago.

IT HAS THE GREAT SUCK


Your
opinion?
643 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback