Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)

▲ 52201 ▼

Release date ≤ Q2 2014.

Average Bench: 2.36% (518th of 713)

Based on 275,372 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0A16 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics Family
Poor: 2%Average: 2.36% Great: 3%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) averaged 97.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 2.75fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 3.52fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) is just 1.19%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 3.72fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.52fps

Average Bench

(Based on 275,372 samples)
Rank 5182.36%
Min Avg Max
1.9 Lighting 2.75 3.36
1.3 Reflection 3.72 9.9
3.1 Parallax 4.52 5.8
2.23% 3.66 fps
Min Avg Max
2.6 MRender 4.15 5.7
1.5 Gravity 1.85 2.2
2.6 Splatting 3.52 4.5
2.6% 3.17 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.97 fps
Asus(1043 16CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.37 fps
Dell(1028 05EA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.93 fps
Legend(17AA 2214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.07 fps
Dell(1028 0640) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.47 fps
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 4.3
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.6 fps
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.5
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.53 fps
HP(103C 2166) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.9
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.03 fps
275,372 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,770,718 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 275,372 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Legend(17AA 220C) 6% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3978) 5% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CB) 5% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380D) 4% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05DE) 4% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 380C) 3% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0866) 3% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0651) 2% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F920) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CA) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E0) 2% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2214) 2% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EA) 2% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0775) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 16CD) 2% 2% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0005) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 131D) 2% 2% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2218) 2% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2212) 2% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05E9) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 390B) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2281) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 130D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EB) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 228A) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 15AD) 1% 3% ± 1%
Dell(1028 061F) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 10D0) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2211) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0005) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2166) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 063E) 1% 2% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0A16) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0640) 1% 2% ± 1%
Acer(1025 079B) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2217) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 22D6) 1% 2% ± 0%
Device(10F7 8338) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 12DD) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0004) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 2163) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0652) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 21B8) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0918) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05EC) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0882) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 220D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 165D) 1% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 227E) 1% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0608) 1% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3542

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples889x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples702x
Core i3-4030UIntelBench 45%, 24,177 samples372x
GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples2,065x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples83x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples64x
A400 480GBKingston  $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples32x
RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples362x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples250x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples193x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25

Popular HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,046

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

11 months ago.

My SP3 crushs any games from 2004 or before, GTAIII,VA,SA,Bully all smooth as butter great for emulation too

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,867

Good

3 years ago.

Not so good. It can only run games like Roblox, Minecraft, Counter Strike 1.6, GTA San Andreas and VALORANT but games like CSGO or GTA won't work with this PC (Laptop)

TUR-User
Avatar level
5,626

Terrible

4 years ago.

Open every game but bad performance...

CAN-User
Avatar level
5,080

Terrible

3 years ago.

Horrible gpu, can barley brake 40 fps in Minecraft, can only run ultra low settings in most games, this doesn't even meet system requirements for most modern games.

IND-User
Avatar level
4,936

Excellent

2 years ago.

Sufficient for non graphics intensive software

ROU-User
Avatar level
4,753

Good

3 years ago.

Cheap unuseable... 3% out of all, in 2019?!

BRA-User
Avatar level
4,751

Excellent

4 years ago.

wait too weak for basically any game

ITA-User
Avatar level
4,153

Average

2 years ago.

Not a good gpu, can do simple 3d tasks and barely supports directx 12. doesnt even have vulkan. can game in some older games and some "recent" with low settings, performs like an xbox 360. similar to a gt 710 (2gb ddr3). performs slightly better than a 710 but its integrated so no big deal, ok if its a secondary gpu, get a dedicated one, this one is bad.

CZE-User
Avatar level
3,416

Good

4 years ago.

It is important to keep ram in dual channel mode if using this GPU. It increase its performance about 25 % (tested in Userbenchmark aplication). This GPU is obviously not for modern gaming, but accompanied with i7 - 4600u and 2 x 4GB ram, it handles surprisingly well the Star Wars Battlefront (2015 version). It was nice surprise for me, as I have considered this GPU to be good just for web browsing or for old games. Compared to its ancestor HD 3000, HD 4400 card is almost twice as strong, thus do not consider this chip to be just useless trash. In 2020 it is still perfectly sufficient for any kind of the non-heavy-graphic office work.

SRB-User
Avatar level
2,866

Good

3 years ago.

Definetly not good for gaming in 2019. For average or office use its fine. Exept if you are fine with cs go running in 800x600 with an avg of 50-60fps.

IRL-User
Avatar level
1,834

Good

3 years ago.

Kinda slow but works well for 720p laptops

Drakorvich
Avatar level
48

Good

4 years ago.

Decent enough for a laptop for school. Also gets good frame rates on older titles and less graphic-intensive games, such as Minecraft or Terraria. Although, for really good frame rates on Minecraft, you need to use Optifine. I was able to get about 70 FPS on average with default settings while paired with an i5-4300u processor, 12 gigs of ddr3l-1600mhz ram, and a Kingston A400 120 GB SSD. Definitely overpowers the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) by a substantial margin, in my opinion.

EthanOZT
Avatar level
26

Terrible

13 months ago.

VERY bad, my old laptop is very bad because it uses this, i can squeeze out 70 fps and just ... my hd 510 does that with low settings and gets to 120 +

Kevin1230san
Avatar level
14

Average

3 years ago.

it's a okay GPU

bembuilds
Avatar level
6

Good

5 years ago.

goodc

pickleboyy
Avatar level
4

Terrible

4 years ago.

IT HAS THE GREAT SUCK

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 10 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback