Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 03:13
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$295
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 287
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,112
102% 854 Pts
64-Core 1125
70% 1125 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 85.2
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 39
69% 55.7 fps
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 34.9
33% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 476 477 480 484 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 474
Mixed 457
SusWrite 476
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 51.7
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 195 186 176 171 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 480
Mixed 366
SusWrite 211
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 52.6
175% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
92GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 286 257 246 244 241 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 480
Mixed 463
SusWrite 284
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 51.5
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 349
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 103 101 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 52
SusWrite 99.1
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
371GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 111 113 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 56
SusWrite 109
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB
863GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 108 107 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 109
132% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback