Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 24 2-Core 43.8 24% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 44.8 8-Core 46.3 6% 45.5 Pts	64-Core 46.1 3% 46.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake) 16,316 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 2.09 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.26 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
QSCD-ST52570XT-128GB 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0417A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 84 41 42 47 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	Read 410 Write 360 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 76.9 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 19.2 57% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 0.4 29% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avant W6451U66J7240ND 1x4GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	99x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	92x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	19x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	17x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $231

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16