TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)

▲ 60557 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2016.

Average Bench: 5.58% (311th of 639)

Based on 101,991 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 5912 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics 630
Poor: 4%Average: 5.58% Great: 7%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) averaged 94.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 19.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 19.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) is just 2.42%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 26.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 22.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 101,991 samples)
Rank 3115.58%
Min Avg Max
0.2 Lighting 19.6 24.4
22.1 Reflection 26.7 31.2
17.4 Parallax 22.7 27.9
5.13% 23 fps
Min Avg Max
9.67 MRender 18.6 26.9
16 Gravity 19.3 22.3
0.1 Splatting 29.1 37.8
5.63% 22.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 24
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 30.6
6% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 37.1
7% 28.5 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 24
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 27.3
6% 25.9 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 37.3
6% 25.4 fps
MSI(1462 7A71) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 27.3
6% 27.3 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 37.4
6% 25.3 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 24.2
6% 25.9 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 37.1
6% 24.1 fps
Dell(1028 07A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 24.3
6% 24.6 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 33.9
6% 22.9 fps
HP(103C 82F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 20.6
5% 21.8 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 32.5
6% 23.8 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 20.8
5% 21.4 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 16
Splatting 29.6
5% 20.2 fps
101,991 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,504,196 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 101,991 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Asus(1043 8694) 29% 5% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 11% 5% ± 1%
Asus(1043 872F) 7% 7% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5912) 4% 6% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A3) 4% 5% ± 0%
HP(103C 82F2) 3% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A1) 3% 6% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3102) 2% 5% ± 1%
Acer(1025 108E) 2% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0763) 2% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07DC) 2% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A15) 2% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A72) 1% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A70) 1% 6% ± 1%
Elitegroup(1019 9C56) 1% 5% ± 0%
HP(103C 838B) 1% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A68) 1% 7% ± 0%
HP(103C 82F1) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82B4) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 82DC) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 8350) 1% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0764) 1% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7994) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82A1) 1% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7996) 1% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 36D9) 1% 5% ± 1%
Biostar(1565 3111) 1% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A2) 1% 6% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3106) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 83C1) 1% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A63) 0% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 8299) 0% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0762) 0% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 3111) 0% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1830) 0% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 829A) 0% 6% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 36C5) 0% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A74) 0% 5% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1189) 0% 5% ± 0%
HP(103C 82A2) 0% 5% ± 1%
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 0% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A65) 0% 5% ± 0%
HP(103C 834F) 0% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7982) 0% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0760) 0% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A71) 0% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 829B) 0% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 829E) 0% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A75) 0% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A59) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) Builds (Compare 3,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3050

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $200Bench 76%, 89,904 samples1,651x
Core i5-7500TIntelBench 72%, 2,663 samples572x
Core i3-7100Intel  $118Bench 68%, 48,791 samples437x
GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 6%, 101,991 samples2,671x
SSD
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 7,273 samples157x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 79%, 10,354 samples148x
X400 2.5 7MM 128GBSandiskBench 64%, 777 samples110x
RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 1,905 samples518x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBUnknownBench 38%, 537 samples303x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 25,079 samples214x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $200

Popular HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
6,514

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

1 day ago.

I have this card in my work computer and... well I have admin access during work at home COVID. So I installed Diabo 3 for after work hours. This card runs it flawlessly! I never would have guessed. So yeah, I like it, not bad at all. I have a Radeon R9 380 in my home PC and it is "500%" better than this one, but I'm not unhappy at all playing on my work PC for LAN parties. LOL

CAN-User
Avatar level
3,448

Good

6 months ago.

So many old graphics cards are still better ie: Gtx 650

FRA-User
Avatar level
3,375

Poor

18 months ago.

it runs smoothly on my laptop even if it don't run most games in Ultra

AUS-User
Avatar level
2,766

Good

6 months ago.

Pretty average, cheap GPU for productive tasks, minor video editing and some light gaming.

THA-User
Avatar level
2,190

Poor

22 days ago.

Damn But i think HD 630 is 1st Graphic intel

EGY-User
Avatar level
1,810

Excellent

2 months ago.

I do not need GPU card , excellent performance.

NOR-User
Avatar level
1,506

Terrible

3 months ago.

sucks, slow af and not worth it, cmon move on to stationary its so much better!

NZL-User
Avatar level
1,486

Terrible

6 months ago.

It gives me aids seeing that people would even consider putting this in their PC

dharmakarma
Avatar level
14

Good

4 months ago.

For pre-Ryzen APU systems, this is the best economic alternative for non-gaming crowd; can even handle large number ( 10000) AutoCAD drawings surprisingly well; obviously low-power draw and suitable for small-footprint systems and those who like quiet at cheap. But after Ryzen APUs entered, this is definitely not good value or performance - i.e. it has become dated.

TheThunderGuy_S
Avatar level
6

Average

12 months ago.

The Intel HD 630 Is Intel's Top Skylake/Kaby Lake iGPU From 2017. It's About 8% Slower Than The Coffee Lake UHD 630. It's Fine For General Computing Tasks But It Simply Can't Game Unless You Try 720p/480p On Lowest Settings Or On Old Games. It's Simply Unusable For Any More Than Very Basic 3D Graphics In This Day And Age. Still, If You Don't Need Any Fancy Programs It Runs Chrome Just Fine :). It Is A Fairly Powerful iGPU (Not Against Vega Though) Compared To Others And Games Like Minecraft Or CS:GO Run Surprisingly Well (Still Low 900p But Almost Constant 60 FPS).

Prizm4
Avatar level
2

Average

12 months ago.

Love the benchmark result: "terrible" :D Compared to the on-board graphics chips of the past, the Intel HD 630 is actually impressive. It can handle basic 3D games like Roblox and Minecraft surprisingly well (you won't get 60fps full screen, but it'll still be very playable). Obviously if you have the option for a stand-alone graphics card, then it'll blow the HD 630 out of the water. If there's no option to install a graphics card, then you *might* get a little better gaming performance by upgrading your CPU (like from an i3 to an i7), and upgrading to 16GB RAM (since the on-board graphics uses a portion of system RAM).

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
vs Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 2060
vs AMD RX 590
vs Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
vs AMD RX 5700

639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps *NEW*
Can You Run It?
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback