TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)

▲ 54853 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2016.

Average Bench: 5.08% (414th of 715)

Based on 153,031 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 5912 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics 630
Poor: 3%Average: 5.08% Great: 7%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) averaged 94.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 6.22fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 6.42fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) is just 3.16%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 11.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 6.85fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 153,031 samples)
Rank 4145.08%
Min Avg Max
5.2 Lighting 6.22 7.35
2.5 Reflection 11.7 65
5 Parallax 6.85 8.5
5.07% 8.26 fps
Min Avg Max
0.2 MRender 6.67 11.3
0.2 Gravity 5.65 8.76
0.1 Splatting 6.42 12
5.13% 6.25 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2128
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.8
8% 10.1 fps
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.5
6% 7 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 13
9% 10.2 fps
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.17 fps
Dell(1028 06B7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.6
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.73 fps
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.4
7% 7.83 fps
HP(103C 802E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4811
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.4
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.83 fps
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 8.6
7% 8.23 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.2 fps
Device(1854 8045) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.27 fps
HP(103C 82DC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 0.3
6% 5 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
153,031 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,017,989 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 153,031 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Asus(1043 8694) 20% 5% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 7% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A3) 7% 5% ± 1%
Asus(1043 872F) 7% 6% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A1) 6% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 3102) 3% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82F2) 3% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07A2) 3% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 3111) 2% 5% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5912) 2% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0763) 2% 5% ± 1%
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1233) 2% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 82A2) 2% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82A1) 2% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 8299) 1% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 07DC) 1% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 829A) 1% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A70) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82B4) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82DC) 1% 5% ± 1%
Acer(1025 108E) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 82A5) 1% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A62) 1% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0762) 1% 4% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A71) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 829E) 1% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 3106) 1% 5% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7996) 1% 4% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A15) 1% 5% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1166) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 838B) 1% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 829B) 1% 6% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 36C5) 1% 5% ± 1%
Elitegroup(1019 9BC9) 1% 5% ± 0%
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0764) 0% 4% ± 1%
HP(103C 834F) 0% 5% ± 1%
Intel(8086 5912) 0% 4% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3113) 0% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A72) 0% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A74) 0% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 079C) 0% 6% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 9C56) 0% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 07DB) 0% 5% ± 1%
Dell(1028 06B7) 0% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 8350) 0% 4% ± 1%
HP(103C 826A) 0% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A69) 0% 4% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7A67) 0% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A63) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) Builds (Compare 4,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3050

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $65Bench 67%, 149,467 samples1,646x
Core i5-6500Intel  $51Bench 64%, 241,476 samples545x
Core i5-7500TIntelBench 66%, 5,419 samples505x
GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples2,552x
SSD
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples91x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples86x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples77x
RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 3,269 samples393x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 3,256 samples157x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 961 samples131x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $65

Popular HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

23 days ago.

TUR-User
Avatar level
5,548

Poor

7 months ago.

this is can open the all games

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,611

Terrible

3 years ago.

it runs smoothly on my laptop even if it don't run most games in Ultra

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,998

Good

4 years ago.

Pretty average, cheap GPU for productive tasks, minor video editing and some light gaming.

ARG-User
Avatar level
3,258

Average

11 months ago.

its ok, can run stuff pretty nice but still gets stomped by literally everything else i thought it was gonna be better than the GTS 450 but i guess it can't compete with nvidia unless its some old ass geforce

EGY-User
Avatar level
3,214

Poor

18 months ago.

I do not need GPU card , excellent performance.

THA-User
Avatar level
3,206

Good

15 months ago.

Damn But i think HD 630 is 1st Graphic intel

ISR-User
Avatar level
2,366

Average

3 months ago.

i use so i cant say something bad about it

HRV-User
Avatar level
2,338

Good

20 months ago.

found on school computers, is powerful enough to play minecraft, and web games, minecraft is fine, it has i7 on every pc

NOR-User
Avatar level
2,300

Terrible

4 years ago.

sucks, slow af and not worth it, cmon move on to stationary its so much better!

NZL-User
Avatar level
2,152

Terrible

4 years ago.

It gives me aids seeing that people would even consider putting this in their PC

mizare
Avatar level
24

Average

4 years ago.

its ok

dharmakarma
Avatar level
14

Good

4 years ago.

For pre-Ryzen APU systems, this is the best economic alternative for non-gaming crowd; can even handle large number ( 10000) AutoCAD drawings surprisingly well; obviously low-power draw and suitable for small-footprint systems and those who like quiet at cheap. But after Ryzen APUs entered, this is definitely not good value or performance - i.e. it has become dated.

commandertuna
Avatar level
6

Poor

4 years ago.

Terrible for games. Absolutely terrible. If you are only playing games and not streaming them, don't buy this card. If you are a streamer however, this card is okay. It has very good QuickSync performance and I use it alot for high quality gameplay recordings. Using the integrated card for streaming and letting the dedicated card handle the rest is a good idea since integrated cards are absolutely terrible at anything else, and offloading the video encoding to your integrated card will save some resources for your games running on the dedicated one. As a stand alone GPU however, it sucks. Just running the windows desktop at 720p will cause this thing to lag. DO NOT USE THIS AS YOUR PRIMARY DISPLAY ADAPTER. YOU WILL REGRET IT.

Prizm4
Avatar level
2

Average

5 years ago.

Love the benchmark result: "terrible" :D Compared to the on-board graphics chips of the past, the Intel HD 630 is actually impressive. It can handle basic 3D games like Roblox and Minecraft surprisingly well (you won't get 60fps full screen, but it'll still be very playable). Obviously if you have the option for a stand-alone graphics card, then it'll blow the HD 630 out of the water. If there's no option to install a graphics card, then you *might* get a little better gaming performance by upgrading your CPU (like from an i3 to an i7), and upgrading to 16GB RAM (since the on-board graphics uses a portion of system RAM).

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 4090

715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback