HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	36.2 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	17.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '17 at 11:57
Run Duration	478 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 149 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 462 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 713 44% 713 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 42.2 29% 36.3 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 37.1 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 740GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2173 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 146 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 66 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1838779036	59.4% Above average	Read 267 Write 211 Mixed 219 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 19.7 99% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 19.6 49% 103 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 386 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 86 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2473387935	59.5% Above average	Read 267 Write 254 Mixed 261 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 31.9 100% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 18 20% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 124%
OCZ Vector 150 480GB-$389 381 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 61GB free Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 2 2 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14587 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 666 (AB) Unknown 80 80 164399440 (AE) Unknown 100 100 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 35 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5750 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6562 (F9) Unknown 100 100 194061728	54.4% Above average	Read 264 Write 254 Mixed 261 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 19.8 82% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 85.2 63% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 59GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16046 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 671 (B1) Unknown 90 90 113 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 48 (F1) Unknown 99 99 52491475038	49.9% Average	Read 261 Write 158 Mixed 168 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 15.9 83% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 52.4 58% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 23GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2174 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 146 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2918447118	64.8% Good	Read 267 Write 212 Mixed 219 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 31.5 116% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 89.5 76% 113 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 133%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 509GB free Firmware: 3000 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 198 Write 98.1 Mixed 127 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.38 92% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 123%
QPXT U3 1.5TB 1TB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	Read 87.8 Write 87.7 Mixed 78.8 109% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.16 65% 0.77 MB/s

QPXT U3 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 226GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.7% Poor	Read 71.5 Write 59.8 Mixed 42.1 70% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.14 53% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 67%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 62GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 5.02 Mixed 8.59 14% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.16 15% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-070.A00LF 82GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 18.1 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	68x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16