| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Medion invalid (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MEDION H110H4-EM2 |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170105 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '20 at 08:52 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.7%
Good
|
73% 123 Pts
|
31% 241 Pts
|
14% 227 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
|
54.8%
Above average
|
55% 59.8 fps
|
54% 66.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 206 308 272 293 297 MB/s
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
73% 322 MB/s
|
124% 45.4 MB/s
|
239% 316 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
582GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 163 165 141 162 MB/s
|
87.4%
Excellent
|
86% 119 MB/s
|
129% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.1%
Good
|
64% 22.5 GB/s
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical invalid Builds (Compare 260 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Medion invalid
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 18x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $198 |