Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 176 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 450 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI Logical Volume 255GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 203GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.1% Very poor	Read 61.8 Write 0.3 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 0.5 11% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 18%
LSI Logical Volume 255GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 136 76 53 53 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 18% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD 4x2GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.6% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16