| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120831 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 10 '20 at 17:20 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.6%
Average
|
43% 65.7 Pts
|
20% 148 Pts
|
9% 148 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
|
31.9%
Below average
|
32% 36.2 fps
|
31% 37.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 238 288 303 304 305 MB/s
|
73.3%
Very good
|
79% 352 MB/s
|
96% 31.3 MB/s
|
175% 234 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.3%
Very poor
|
16% 5.53 GB/s
|
12% 4.03 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A85X-UP4 Builds (Compare 57 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - $75
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 20x |
| A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 17x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 10x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 5x |
| Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $313 |