Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 218 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 632 65% 526 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 239 175 166 160 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 439 Mixed 342 SusWrite 203 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 52.1 171% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 346 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 91GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 109 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 85 Mixed 35 SusWrite 107 58% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 67%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 124GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 97.3 Write 97.5 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 68.9 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 129GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 78 78 78 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 95.3 Mixed 55 SusWrite 76.9 60% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avexir DDR4-2666 CL15 4GB 4x4GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 21.2 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,000x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	253x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16