Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 765
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 115
Parallax 113
89% 112 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 101
Splatting 83.2
76% 93.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 129 120 130 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 377
Write 153
Mixed 191
SusWrite 128
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 38.4
146% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 120
104% 156 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 73%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
927GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 474 475 476 478 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 469
Mixed 440
SusWrite 476
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.4
213% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
192GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 432 418 419 420 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 466
Mixed 410
SusWrite 430
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 59.6
207% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 249
218% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
45GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,437
Write 2,198
Mixed 1,349
442% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 89.1
301% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,150
853% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 177 194 196 188 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 140
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 178
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
60GB free, PID 01ea
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 40 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 36
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 38.2
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $667
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback