Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	68GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 68GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5679 40 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 176 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 568 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 1,301 80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 24GB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 75% HP(103C 1157) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 97.2 Parallax 91.3 81% 95.8 fps	MRender 82.5 Gravity 90.5 Splatting 81.6 69% 84.9 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,677 Write 2,174 Mixed 2,316 532% 2,389 MB/s	4K Read 231 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 192 689% 200 MB/s	DQ Read 558 DQ Write 435 DQ Mixed 487 367% 493 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 30 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2GB free Firmware: 3B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 118 Write 84.7 Mixed 94.4 22% 99 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 8.8 42% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 37.2 DQ Mixed 25.6 30% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 11GB free Firmware: SD35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 71 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 66.4 Write 21.1 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 71.1 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 I... 102GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.1% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16