Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 08:02
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5640
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 109
53% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 326
33% 267 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 19.4
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 14.4
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shinedisk M746 PLUS 256G 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
Read 265
Write 249
Mixed 256
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 29
101% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 60.5
67% 113 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 158
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.22
74% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
183GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 42.4
Mixed 55.2
38% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.16
28% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 57%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
472GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 68.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 7.36
55% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.16
19% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GB
1066, 33 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback