Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 173 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 350 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 314 20% 314 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 36.5 35% 36.6 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 35.5 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GCSS 256GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTAN103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 105 103 102 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 292 Write 192 Mixed 273 SusWrite 102 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 21.9 72% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 37.6 28% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 105 103 101 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 118 Write 110 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 104 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 973GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 97.2 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 98.5 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.4 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	324x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	305x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $215

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16