Asus P5Q-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-VM  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 9 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 80.5
40% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 76
8-Core 85.8
11% 80.9 Pts
64-Core 85.7
5% 85.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
EVGA(3842 C959) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 20 55 74 78 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 134
Write 110
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 60.6
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 107%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
495GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 28 57 75 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 34
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 62.7
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 51%
Lexar JumpDrive 16GB
6GB free, PID a817
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.3 5.4 5.7 5.2 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 5.1
10% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 7%
UFD USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a790
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.2 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Read 16
Write 7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.3
12% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 7%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 9.6 8.9 9.5 9.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 18.5
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 12.1
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.9 3.6 2.8 3.2 2.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.9
8% 7.37 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.5
167% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-VM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback