User System

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory	22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140312
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 12:54
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 132 58% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 379 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 19.5 18% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 16.3 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9206 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 721 (B1) Unknown 97 97 124 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 49 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68919658189	72.1% Very good	Read 264 Write 247 Mixed 256 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 36.6 122% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 95.7 96% 156 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 124%
Patriot Torqx 2 128GB SSD 63 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 119GB free Firmware: S5FAM007 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12196 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3902 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 372 (AD) Unknown 100 100 16122812 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 246 (F5) Unknown 100 100 956 (F6) Unknown 100 100 32316280 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 2020 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0	39% Below average	Read 244 Write 222 Mixed 218 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 4.14 45% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 76.1 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 4.64 21% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 39%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB 7,947 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 211GB free Firmware: PC4OCH0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 151 100 115964116994 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 6531 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 34 34 29320 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3497 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 2424832 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 48 622395429 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10354846 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1336495 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	57.9% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 105 Mixed 96.2 75% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS722012K9SA00 120GB-$55 111 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 112GB free Firmware: DCCOC60A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 120 100 120259084290 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4504 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 65541 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 13051 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2542 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2228226 (BC) Unknown 100 98 24 (BE) vendor-specific 71 45 504889373 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 94 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 20709692 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 24785 (C2) HDA temperature 189 100 236224053277 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	30% Poor	Read 54.6 Write 49.7 Mixed 50.6 39% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.38 88% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 30%
WD WD1600ADFD-60NLR1 160GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 110GB free Firmware: 21.07QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 196 0 (03) Spinup time 161 158 4950 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3184 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9348 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1100 (C2) HDA temperature 103 92 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 18 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 16 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 8	40.4% Average	Read 70.3 Write 70 Mixed 69.9 53% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.41 107% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 49%
HP External HDD 999GB 996 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 146GB free, PID 4607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 25.3 Mixed 14.8 28% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.26 52% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 36.5 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)