Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9SRL-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRL-F
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '18 at 15:33
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 153 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 473 48% 389 Pts	64-Core 780 48% 780 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3967) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 40.7 40% 45.3 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 37.3 32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 857GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 424 412 424 430 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 407 Mixed 396 SusWrite 429 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 40.7 138% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 358 268% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 205GB free Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 157 157 171 163 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 351 Write 326 Mixed 278 SusWrite 161 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 35 113% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 188 160% 235 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 107%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 804GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 128 139 133 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 364 Write 354 Mixed 339 SusWrite 132 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 33.1 106% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 269 197% 256 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 133%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 728GB free Firmware: DN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 115 91 105 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 104%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 346GB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 133 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 156 Write 145 Mixed 76 SusWrite 132 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 175 177 176 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 160 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 175 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
X100 128GBSanDiskBench 73%, 1,695 samples	1x

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GBMicronBench 70%, 42 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 559 samples	1x
BLS8G3D169DS3.16F 4x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 25 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16