Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 238
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 604
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 106
Parallax 69.5
57% 81.8 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 68.9
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 160 143 137 126 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 465
Mixed 400
SusWrite 171
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 49.3
163% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 125 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 125
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00WN4A0 1TB
929GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 42.1
Mixed 33
SusWrite 41.7
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.M16FB CT8G4DFD8213.M16FB Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback