HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150219
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 02:04
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$188 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 442 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1495) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.44 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.48 2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1147 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1075 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (64) Unknown 100 100 581824 (65) Unknown 100 100 86656 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 171 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1362 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 28 100 137440002076 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1147 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 1147 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1010 (EA) Unknown 100 100 258 (F1) Unknown 100 100 575 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1063 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1147	62% Good	Read 464 Write 242 Mixed 248 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 10.9 70% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 19.9 61% 135 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 88%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127 6,562 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 405GB free Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1966 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3007 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 8080 (0A) Spinup retry count 160 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2462 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 379 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2841247845 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 197474 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 244813529120 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 96 (DE) Loaded hours 84 84 6565 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 385 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	38.3% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 67.5 Mixed 64.3 50% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.27 78% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 47%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 7.41 Mixed 9.81 13% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.92 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.03 46% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 9905584-014.A00LF F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,670x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	546x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	124x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16