Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 11:40
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 99
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 307
31% 253 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 28
Parallax 47.9
32% 38.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 34.7
27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
44% Average
Read 435
Write 253
Mixed 282
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 6.39
34% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 7.48
10% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
83GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 56
Write 56.9
Mixed 58.6
43% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.02
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 51%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
6GB free, PID 162f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 9.94
18% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.47
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 1.29
123% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3G1600LV2G 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback