bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel D5400XS
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core2 Extreme X9775
J6PR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 88.3
39% 63 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 302
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 31.6
18% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 25
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 128 109 92 78 81 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 220
Write 185
Mixed 196
SusWrite 107
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 24.9
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 146
110% 146 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 133%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 215GB
192GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 28 39 48 51 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 34.6
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 38.6
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 6
1,066% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
1GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.9
Write 48.9
Mixed 35.7
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
324GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 93 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 52.3
Write 52.9
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 96.5
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback