Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171102
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '21 at 19:50
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 273 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 880 80% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,140 71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.4% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 84% 107 fps	MRender 95.7 Gravity 103 Splatting 101 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 717GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 1475 1485 1478 1479 1488 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 1,905 Write 1,901 Mixed 1,576 SusWrite 1,509 388% 1,723 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 60.1 197% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,033 DQ Write 654 DQ Mixed 853 633% 846 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 347%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$100 16,039 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 360GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 377 377 375 379 379 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 419 Mixed 341 SusWrite 376 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 32.5 106% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 273 224% 320 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 121%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 121GB free Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 1509 1511 1510 1512 1520 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 1,937 Write 1,800 Mixed 1,587 SusWrite 1,555 387% 1,720 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 58.7 200% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,056 DQ Write 726 DQ Mixed 895 667% 892 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 347%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 154 155 155 156 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 143 Mixed 80 SusWrite 155 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 112%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 219 214 219 214 215 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 199 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 216 130% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.6 357% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 136%
SanDisk Ultra 249GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 7GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 28 27 25 25 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 146 Write 33.4 Mixed 66 SusWrite 25.7 74% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.1 130% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 40%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1TB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 7.9 8.2 8 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 25.6 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 7.9 28% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 25.8 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $184Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	680x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	166x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	223x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	83x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	74x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	97x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $825

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16