Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB252
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '17 at 06:54
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 118 52% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 185 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2696 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.78 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.52 4% 4.89 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 484 Mixed 498 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 40 138% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 158 155% 246 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD 3200BEK External 320GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 48GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 31 Write 22.8 Mixed 11.4 25% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.34 71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 21%
Intenso Premium Line 8GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 132 Write 7.88 Mixed 14 41% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.51 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.66 79% 3.01 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 13.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK S752 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	45x
Core i5-3340MIntelBench 53%, 12,487 samples	30x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	124x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	13x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	7x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16