MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMSI MS-7845
MotherboardMSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '17 at 22:34
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 38%
CPU Throttled 5%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 23
2-Core 40.4
29% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 74.7
8-Core 109
11% 91.9 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.9% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 59.9
20% 38.7 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 39.9
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
954GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,173
Write 1,556
Mixed 1,436
312% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 36.3
140% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 40.1
41% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 188%
Great: 363%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
99GB free
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 493
Write 401
Mixed 444
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 14.7
69% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 59.6
DQ Write 34.6
DQ Mixed 17.9
21% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
4TB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 145
Mixed 139
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.29
120% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
842GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 68.8
Mixed 71.6
53% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) Builds (Compare 1,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback