Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 595
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$291
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 104
Parallax 105
93% 108 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.9
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
511GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 369 393 405 404 409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 441
Mixed 279
SusWrite 376
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 34.8
127% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 159
163% 269 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 117%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
286GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 7.9 4.6 8.2 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 6.4
2% 3.28 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
215GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 129 129 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 68.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 124
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK5076GSX 500GB
185GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 40.9
Write 37.8
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 13.6
39% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
468GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 108 105 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 85.8
Write 85.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 106
113% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 63%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
561GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 86.9
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 91.7
99% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
475GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.9
Write 78.8
Mixed 33.1
78% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 41%
Generic External 1TB
502GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 37.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 12.7
39% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 25%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
88GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 45 46 45 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 44.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 43.9
53% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
50GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 40
Write 36.7
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 14.6
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $102
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback