MSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89)

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C89
Motherboard	MSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89) (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201116
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '21 at 06:36
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 74.3 1-Core 147 2-Core 287 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 938 90% 745 Pts	64-Core 1,227 76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 8E90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.9% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 106 Parallax 102 96% 108 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 84.6 83% 105 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB 5,487 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231610WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 614 216 237 234 227 237 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1495 Write 1,491 Mixed 1,168 SusWrite 294 249% 1,112 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 50 171% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,002 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 228 252% 451 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 226%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 921GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 144 142 140 144 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 163 Write 134 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 142 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x16GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 9.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 5R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	17%	118	318	246	165	31.5"	1920 1080	AOC3230 AG323FWG3R3

History: Score 17: 2R 0G 7B | Score 54: 5R 7G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89)

CPU
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	40x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	38x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	17x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	13x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
256GB 256GBMidasforceBench 90%, 1,014 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	5x
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16