Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130528
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 467 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1356 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 86.9 49% 69.7 fps	MRender 61.5 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 46.7 45% 56 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110 3,009 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1311 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 215 213 221 229 241 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.2% Good	Read 250 Write 232 Mixed 175 SusWrite 224 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 28 94% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 123 110% 166 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 109%
MB0500EBNCR 500GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 56GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 75 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 95.8 Write 98.7 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 74.8 65% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 78%
Toshiba StorE HDD 320GB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 208GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	8.58% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 24.6 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 16.3 25% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.58% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 124GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.69% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 26 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 16.5 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.69% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 510 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 0GB free, PID a00a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29 Write 26 Mixed 20 31% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 46%
Generic External 500GB 1,039 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 273GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 26 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 27.3 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 0R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	15%	60	317	243	50	32"	1280 720	TSB0107 TOSHIBA-TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

CPU
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	477x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	330x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	172x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	156x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	126x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	145x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	75x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	648x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	576x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	324x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16