Average Bench: 8.01% (254th of 597)

Based on 6,436 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DD8 Model: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 2000 averaged 91.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 22.2fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 24.6fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 2000 is just 1.3%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 22.8fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 18.9fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,436 samples)
Min Avg Max
20.5 Lighting 22.2 23.2
21.2 Reflection 22.8 23.5
14.5 Parallax 19.6 22.3
6.57% 21.5 fps
Min Avg Max
19.1 MRender 20.2 21.1
21.7 Gravity 24.6 24.4
18 Splatting 18.9 19.8
9.1% 21.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.5
7% 22.2 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 19.8
9% 21.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 20.4
7% 22.2 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 19.8
9% 21.3 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.3
7% 22.1 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 19.7
9% 21.2 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.3
7% 22.1 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 19.5
9% 21.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 20.2
7% 22.1 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 19.7
9% 21.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 20.3
7% 22 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 19.5
9% 21 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 23
Parallax 19.6
7% 21.7 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 19.6
9% 21 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 267.79
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.1
7% 22.4 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 19.9
9% 20.6 fps
6,436 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 12,691,591 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 6,436 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 59% 8% ± 1%
HP(103C 084A) 40% 8% ± 1%
HP(103C 0914) 1% 8% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 0% 8% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 2000 Builds (Compare 3,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $106

Popular Quadro 2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

7 months ago.

still does all my 3d printing programs so I'm pleased that such an old card is working for the things i need it for.


Your
opinion?
597 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $67
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $250Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $129SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $82G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback