Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 17:36
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 890
90% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3220) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 51.2
32% 41.1 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 38
Splatting 22.8
24% 30 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 59 93 64 108 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 516
Write 447
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 122
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
10% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 100%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 64 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 62.6
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 64.6
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS722010K9SA00 100GB
53GB free
Firmware: DC2ZC75A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 37 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 1.2
Write 34.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 38.6
14% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 SAM074A SMFX2490HD
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback