PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210810 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '21 at 17:36 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3220) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 59 93 64 108 47 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 64 64 66 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS722010K9SA00 100GB
53GB free
Firmware: DC2ZC75A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 37 39 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
66%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 24" | 1280 720 | SAM074A SMFX2490HD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 2,621x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 1,227x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 854x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 820x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 700x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 622x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $688 |