Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H110M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	32 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 203 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 399 50% 379 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 29.4 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 40.8 24% 33.2 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 27.1 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 113 97 107 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 284 Write 210 Mixed 194 SusWrite 118 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 22 115% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 169 124% 160 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 85%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 106GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 76.5 Write 68.2 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 60.6 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.3% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 20 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 21.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 23: 1R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
23%	13%	83	94	3	60	27"	1920 1080	AOC2790 2790

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	65x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	45x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	22x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16