Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '17 at 09:48
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 97.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 90% 158 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 756 78% 628 Pts	64-Core 958 59% 958 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 60.5 Parallax 94.9 58% 75.6 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 77.7 55% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8243 (0C) Power cycle count 83 83 16322 (B1) Unknown 92 92 94 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 42 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 80 80 19807 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14173 (F1) Unknown 99 99 52426144397	89.5% Excellent	Read 509 Write 354 Mixed 354 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 24.8 124% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 77.4 102% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 118%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 459GB free Firmware: MK7O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 148 148 34385494467 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6162 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4635 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6326 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6326 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 210454183973 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53.4% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 92.1 Mixed 80.2 66% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.45 113% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH162 998GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 320GB free Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 89 46633024 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 25367 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 59 54 279231572054 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13230 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 79 79 22083 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2675 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295032896 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 71 53 13440450589 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 19188 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 45 45 111737 (C2) HDA temperature 29 47 -140737488355299 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 64218351018237 (F1) Unknown 100 253 107370793483086 (F2) Unknown 100 253 88991804144261	62.5% Good	Read 110 Write 108 Mixed 103 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.36 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 265GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 163 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8389 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2533 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6182 (C0) Power-off retract count 193 193 5784 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 29023 (C2) HDA temperature 118 105 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.5% Above average	Read 72.8 Write 103 Mixed 94.3 68% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.23 80% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 197GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 134 134 21493186843 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12609 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 103 103 42 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6021 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 9490 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 12939 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 12939 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 184683921439 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 16	72.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 122 Mixed 129 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 54.4 MC Write 54.2 MC Mixed 47.8 149% 52.1 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	254x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	31x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16