Average Bench: 51% (125th of 714)

Based on 37,353 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67B0 Model: AMD Radeon R9 200

Average average bench

The AMD R9 290X averaged 49.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 66.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 63.4fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 290X is just 8.44%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 290X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 71fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 90.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 37,353 samples)
Min Avg Max
58.3 Lighting 66.3 72.1
66.8 Reflection 71 74.3
81.9 Parallax 90.8 99.8
54% 76 fps
Min Avg Max
59 MRender 62.4 65
58 Gravity 63.4 66.6
42.6 Splatting 44.3 46
45.1% 56.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 94.2
58% 79.3 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 44.7
46% 57.9 fps
Asus(1043 0474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 94.6
57% 79.6 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 45.8
47% 59.1 fps
MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 93.3
56% 77.9 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 44.7
46% 57.8 fps
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 85.1
55% 75.4 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 65
Splatting 45.2
46% 58 fps
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1112 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 94.6
54% 79 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 48.5
49% 61.4 fps
37,353 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,469,103 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 37,353 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $549 @ launch in Oct '13)
Sapphire(174B E285) 23% 51% ± 2%
Sapphire R9 290X 4GB TRI-X OC
11226-00-40G
MSI(1462 3080) 13% 50% ± 4%
Asus(1043 046C) 10% 53% ± 3%
Asus R9 290X 4GB DirectCU II
R9290X-DC2OC-4GD5
XFX(1682 9290) 10% 50% ± 2%
XFX R9 290X 4GB Double Dissipation
R9290XEDFD
Gigabyte(1458 2281) 6% 52% ± 3%
Asus(1043 046A) 6% 51% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E289) 6% 51% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2342) 5% 51% ± 3%
AMD(1002 0B00) 4% 50% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E282) 4% 50% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 2342) 3% 49% ± 5%
Asus(1043 0466) 2% 49% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3070) 2% 55% ± 5%
Asus(1043 0474) 2% 52% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 227C) 2% 51% ± 3%
MSI(1462 3082) 1% 53% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3071) 1% 52% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2020) 1% 52% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0472) 0% 50% ± 2%
MSI(1462 8038) 0% 49% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 228D) 0% 52% ± 0%
XFX(1682 9395) 0% 52% ± 0%
PowerColor(148C 2347) 0% 50% ± 0%
AMD(1002 4002) 0% 48% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 290X Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $824

Popular R9 290X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 10 years ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Comment 

I own less than 5 of these 290x. Assorted brands. They overheat (not a problem until they start cooking your sound card). The fans are so incredibly loud and make so little difference in temperature, you can not set your monitor to 1080p 120hz manually because of lack of driver support (I can do this with nvidia), you will get black screens after playing for hours under mysterious conditions (your entire screen goes black). Have a driver problem? Get ready to re-install windows, the software is so toxic you have to reformat the hard drive if it didn't work the first time. I am sure I could go on but thousands of dollars later I just don't care for them. Pros: great looking spec numbers that do not work in real life, Cheap by comparison to the real thing. If you would like to simulate the console experience on a PC I highly recommend AMD. Just remember to lower your settings.—Sep '14

Comment 

In terms of absolute minimum FPS and superior fundamental performance, the 290x is vastly superior to the 970 at everything except maximum burst framerate at 1080p, an absolutely useless performance metric commonly used by reviewers and nvidia to hide issues with relative smoothness. In terms of minimum FPS, the 290x is also very comparable to the 980, especially when you consider the superior crossfire implementation, yielding considerably better minimum FPS and scaling than 'SLI' will ever be capable of without a major hardware and complimentary software overhaul. SLI is broken. Crossfire is NOT. You can see nearly 100% scaling in a surprising number of titles. Add in a mantle/dx12 forward-looking arch, and clearly this iteration of GNC will continue in the spirit of GCN 1.0: fantastic compute performance that developers have only begun to utilize effectively. Just take note of how poorly the 680 compares to the 7950, let alone 7970.—Apr '15

Comment 

Flagship performance with a hefty aftermarket cooler for $300, and very overclockable. Unbeatable price:performance for single-card ultra settings solutions.—Apr '15

Comment 

Great GPU 290X 8GB X2 (crossfire) @ 1080 x 5670 Best GPU's ever. destroys everything! —Aug '15


Good

3 months ago.

MSI AMD R9 290X. My favorite card since more then 4 years now and it still works great for me, new games in FHD as well as some old games in 4k 60fps.

Comment 

I purchased a sapphire r9 290x tri-x oc, super low temperatures, low noise also on high load it handles all games maxed out at 60 FPS. I don't care about power consumption.—Nov '15


Excellent

7 months ago.

it's just what i need as a mid-range gamer


Good

2 years ago.

Old but strong. Still relevant in the 1080p world.


Poor

7 months ago.

GPU since 2014 and still kicking games


Good

3 years ago.

one of the greatest GPUs , it is still holding up in 2018 with high to ultra 1080p settings in games


Good

2 years ago.

Got this thing 5 years ago and its still going strong


Good

2 years ago.

300 fps+ in csgo for next to nothing


Good

4 years ago.

very old card but can play most of the games in 2019 very well


Average

4 years ago.

Runs hot and has high power consumption but has 8 GB of HBM VRAM which is notably higher than thecomparable GTX 970 which has 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Good cards even today if you can deal with both heat and power consumption thanks to nearly similar performance and amount of VRAM as newer RX 580.


Average

4 years ago.

Beast for its time.


Excellent

15 months ago.

290 X is legend , still rememberd


Below average

8 years ago.

Good card, but not worth the NOISE and HEAT it comes with


Good

5 years ago.

Last AMD card worth buying. Even the RX 580 is barely an upgrade in performance. It performs well but is hot and loud.


Average

18 months ago.

TOOOOOOOOOO HOT!


Average

14 months ago.

Way to much TDP and heat .. it was a monster in it's glory days but now, in 2023 it can't keep up anymore and the circuitry is worn. Tried to OC mine a little and now it glitches .. especially over 60 degrees celcius. Replace these.


Very good

8 years ago.

Own the 290X crossfired, now liquid cooled with Aquacomputer Kyrographic Hawaii block... an execellent performer when heat and fan noise is dealt with. With the new AMD software, heat and noise can be reduced using Frame Rate Target Control (if you have a 60Hz monitor set FRTC to 60FPS)...far less heat and power consumption leading to less noise (mainly on reference cards even better on 3rd party cards) Please please please, get/save up and get a Freesync monitor...gosh I can't go back...much smoother game play even at 60Hz UBm claims it has terrible inconsistency but I would tie that to different overclock setting used. Check out my build https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/b/8dkTwP

Info  uk.pcpartpicker.com/...

Liquid Cooled Luxe


Excellent

4 years ago.

I own 2 PC at home with this card. Even thought they're quite old by now, they still can compete with actual low price cards.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback