Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update) 33 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 84 47% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 118 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 27GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 44 33 25 31 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.4% Very poor	Read 166 Write 204 Mixed 303 SusWrite 31.8 40% 176 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 8.3 17% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 9.6 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16