PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5QL-E (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081201 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 03 '21 at 00:32 |
Run Duration | 311 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 105 54 30 23 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
273GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 75 73 77 66 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
32GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 75 73 77 66 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
26GB free, PID 0111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
6.73%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 19x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 11x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $308 |