Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 30 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 82 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 881 89% 722 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 40.3 37% 42.9 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 28.5 29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 598 450 404 403 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 2,555 Write 649 Mixed 857 SusWrite 474 247% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 12 110% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 427GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2278 610 620 621 617 623 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,529 Write 2,367 Mixed 1,690 SusWrite 895 418% 1,870 MB/s	4K Read 60.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 79 261% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 690 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 639 468% 616 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 326GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 339 395 415 416 385 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 486 Mixed 463 SusWrite 382 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 55.9 188% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 912GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 174 186 190 189 164 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 154 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 175 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 754GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 196 198 199 198 200 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 145 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 196 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 927GB free Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 190 187 190 190 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 154 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 187 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop HDD 1TB (2013) 2,070 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 346GB free Firmware: CC92 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 86 87 90 86 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 89.9 Write 87.4 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 86.9 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 71%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB 3,696 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 435GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 81 81 81 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 75.6 Write 75.1 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 78.7 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 48%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 58GB free, PID 0111 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 19.9 Write 19.4 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 19.7 26% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.6 236% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 5,028 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 39.3 100% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 39 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)