MSI Z490-A PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI Z490-A PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 148
2-Core 289
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 956
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 97%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 145
Parallax 139
118% 143 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 128
Splatting 110
107% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 1353 1379 1407 1410 1415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1434
Write 1376
Mixed 1,079
SusWrite 1376
296% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 62
227% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 249
325% 577 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 244%
Great: 295%
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 240GB
86GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 114 96 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 467
Write 283
Mixed 331
SusWrite 153
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 32.9
130% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 190
169% 252 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
485GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 90.9
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 97.1
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
182GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 74.3
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 159
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
360GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 130 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 131
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
28GB free, PID 0031
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 97.1
Write 16.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 18.7
34% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
59% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 27.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 20,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z490-A PRO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback