Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration433 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 493
62% 470 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 61.2
32% 52.2 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 40.1
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 126 125 77 111 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 329
Write 226
Mixed 238
SusWrite 121
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 14.5
80% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 100
89% 134 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 88%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 70 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 36.7
Write 36.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 68.9
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
60GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 60 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 60.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 59.9
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-151.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-151.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback